Every Friday I update my free sports analysis.
Today I will cover the game between Stanford and UCLA. I believe based on the previous games that Stanford has a better team. It should be an interesting game non-the less.
Stanford beat UCLA 35-17 in the Rose Bowl last week and the Cardinal should take care of business on the Farm tonight. Freshman quarterback Kevin Hogan has boosted the Stanford offense the last 3 weeks since taking over as the starting quarterback and Stanford has been 0.4 yards per play better with Hogan at quarterback (compensated for opposing defenses). The Cardinal are now 0.7 yppl better than average offensively with a good blend of run and pass (Hogan has averaged 6.6 yards per pass play against teams that would allow just 5.6 yppp to an average quarterback) and that attack should perform with efficiency agaisnt a mediocre UCLA defense that's allowed 5.7 yppl to teams that would combine to average 5.6 yppl against an average defensive team. Stanford gained 404 yards at 5.9 yppl last week in L.A. and my math model projects 415 yards at 6.2 yppl for the Cardinal here in Palo Alto.
The battle in this game is between UCLA's better than average offense (0.6 yppl better than average) against a very stingy Stanford defense that's been 1.5 yppl better than average this season (4.6 yppl allowed to teams that would combine to average 6.1 yppl against an average defensive team). Stanford has a significant edge in the season rating of the two units and the Cardinal held UCLA's Pistol attack to a modest 334 yards at 4.7 yppl last week. My math projects 326 yards at 4.4 yppl for UCLA this week on the road.
These two teams actually played to expectations last week, as the yardage numbers were extremely close to projections, while the final 35-17 margin was higher than it should have been given the stats. Stanford is clearly the better team and my math model favors the Cardinal by 10 points in this game.
The battle in this game is between UCLA's better than average offense (0.6 yppl better than average) against a very stingy Stanford defense that's been 1.5 yppl better than average this season (4.6 yppl allowed to teams that would combine to average 6.1 yppl against an average defensive team). Stanford has a significant edge in the season rating of the two units and the Cardinal held UCLA's Pistol attack to a modest 334 yards at 4.7 yppl last week. My math projects 326 yards at 4.4 yppl for UCLA this week on the road.
These two teams actually played to expectations last week, as the yardage numbers were extremely close to projections, while the final 35-17 margin was higher than it should have been given the stats. Stanford is clearly the better team and my math model favors the Cardinal by 10 points in this game.
Average Team Stats for 2012
Rushing Stats | Passing Stats | Total | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pts | Atts | Yds | Ypr | Fum | Comp | Att | Int | Yds | Ypp | Sack | Yppp | Yds | Yppl | |
UCLA-Offense | 37.7 | 41 | 231 | 5.6 | 1.18 | 23 | 37 | 0.82 | 261 | 7.0 | 3.3 | 7.0 | 493 | 6.3 |
UCLA-Defense | 25.0 | 32 | 166 | 5.0 | 1.18 | 23 | 41 | 1.36 | 255 | 6.1 | 3.5 | 6.1 | 421 | 5.6 |
League Average | 27.4 | 35 | 179 | 4.9 | 0.83 | 19 | 33 | 0.92 | 212 | 6.3 | 2.0 | 6.3 | 391 | 5.6 |
Stanford-Offense | 28.0 | 35 | 177 | 5.0 | 0.64 | 17 | 31 | 0.91 | 206 | 6.5 | 1.4 | 6.5 | 383 | 5.7 |
Stanford-Defense | 16.9 | 25 | 100 | 3.9 | 1.00 | 25 | 46 | 1.09 | 231 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 331 | 4.6 |
Ypp = Yards per pass attempt
Yppp = Yards per pass play (attempts + sacks)
Yppl = Yards per play (rushes + passes + sacks)
Yppp = Yards per pass play (attempts + sacks)
Yppl = Yards per play (rushes + passes + sacks)
UCLA: SU: 9-3-0, ATS: 7-5-0
GAME LOGS 2012 | RUSHING | PASSING | TOTAL | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Opponent | Score | Spread | Atts | Yds | Ypr | Fum | Comp | Att | Yds | Int | Sac | Yppp | Yds | Yppl |
08/30/12 @ Rice | 49-24 | -16.5 W | 37/47 | 350/219 | 9.5/4.7 | 1/1 | 24/18 | 32/30 | 296/142 | 1/1 | 2/7 | 8.7/3.8 | 646/361 | 9.1/4.3 |
09/08/12 Nebraska | 36-30 | +5.5 W | 54/36 | 362/278 | 6.7/7.7 | 1/1 | 22/17 | 38/31 | 296/161 | 0/1 | 3/2 | 7.2/4.9 | 658/439 | 6.9/6.4 |
09/15/12 Houston | 37-6 | -17.0 W | 55/19 | 269/141 | 4.9/7.4 | 3/1 | 27/28 | 42/60 | 300/247 | 2/5 | 3/1 | 6.7/4.0 | 569/388 | 5.7/4.9 |
09/22/12 Oregon St. | 20-27 | -7.5 L | 28/41 | 85/142 | 3.0/3.5 | 0/1 | 27/24 | 42/35 | 359/359 | 0/1 | 2/3 | 8.2/9.4 | 444/501 | 6.2/6.3 |
09/29/12 @ Colorado | 42-14 | -19.0 W | 41/30 | 236/95 | 5.8/3.2 | 1/1 | 25/23 | 40/35 | 260/214 | 0/1 | 3/4 | 6.0/5.5 | 496/309 | 5.9/4.5 |
10/06/12 @ California | 17-43 | -2.5 L | 34/42 | 176/206 | 5.2/4.9 | 2/2 | 31/25 | 47/30 | 215/275 | 4/1 | 6/4 | 4.1/8.1 | 391/481 | 4.5/6.3 |
10/13/12 Utah | 21-14 | -8.0 L | 47/27 | 177/85 | 3.8/3.1 | 1/0 | 15/25 | 21/35 | 177/234 | 0/1 | 2/2 | 7.7/6.3 | 354/319 | 5.1/5.0 |
10/27/12 @ Arizona St. | 45-43 | +6.5 W | 47/59 | 231/243 | 4.9/4.1 | 1/0 | 19/25 | 29/35 | 255/292 | 1/1 | 5/5 | 7.5/7.3 | 486/535 | 6.0/5.4 |
11/03/12 Arizona | 66-10 | -3.0 W | 63/40 | 317/138 | 5.0/3.5 | 0/3 | 25/17 | 30/30 | 294/119 | 0/0 | 1/4 | 9.5/3.5 | 611/257 | 6.5/3.5 |
11/10/12 @ Washington St. | 44-36 | -15.5 L | 35/30 | 110/103 | 3.1/3.4 | 2/2 | 18/37 | 21/57 | 229/421 | 1/1 | 4/6 | 9.2/6.7 | 339/524 | 5.7/5.6 |
11/17/12 USC | 38-28 | +3.5 W | 49/30 | 231/177 | 4.7/5.9 | 1/1 | 22/23 | 30/41 | 195/336 | 0/2 | 5/1 | 5.6/8.0 | 426/513 | 5.1/7.1 |
Notes: | 1. Spreads shown relative to the UCLA. 2. Stats read as Offense/Defense or UCLA/Opponent. 3. Stats are versus Div-1A teams only. Div-1AA games are not included. |
Stanford: SU: 10-2-0, ATS: 6-4-2
GAME LOGS 2012 | RUSHING | PASSING | TOTAL | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Opponent | Score | Spread | Atts | Yds | Ypr | Fum | Comp | Att | Yds | Int | Sac | Yppp | Yds | Yppl |
08/31/12 San Jose St. | 20-17 | -24.0 L | 39/27 | 162/89 | 4.2/3.3 | 0/1 | 16/24 | 26/35 | 121/199 | 0/1 | 1/3 | 4.5/5.2 | 283/288 | 4.3/4.4 |
09/08/12 Duke | 50-13 | -15.0 W | 23/23 | 104/44 | 4.5/1.9 | 0/1 | 18/42 | 33/63 | 272/341 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 8.0/5.2 | 376/385 | 6.6/4.4 |
09/15/12 USC | 21-14 | +9.0 W | 36/28 | 201/47 | 5.6/1.7 | 0/1 | 15/20 | 32/41 | 215/233 | 2/2 | 0/4 | 6.7/5.2 | 416/280 | 6.1/3.8 |
09/27/12 @ Washington | 13-17 | -6.5 L | 27/31 | 80/165 | 3.0/5.3 | 1/0 | 18/19 | 37/37 | 157/153 | 1/1 | 2/3 | 4.0/3.8 | 237/318 | 3.6/4.5 |
10/06/12 Arizona | 54-48 | -10.0 L | 43/34 | 260/143 | 6.0/4.2 | 1/0 | 21/45 | 34/69 | 357/474 | 0/1 | 1/3 | 10.2/6.6 | 617/617 | 7.9/5.8 |
10/13/12 @ Notre Dame | 13-20 | +7.0 T | 39/43 | 152/190 | 3.9/4.4 | 0/3 | 12/16 | 25/28 | 122/160 | 2/0 | 1/4 | 4.7/5.0 | 274/350 | 4.2/4.7 |
10/20/12 @ California | 21-3 | -2.5 W | 46/28 | 253/27 | 5.5/1.0 | 1/2 | 17/19 | 32/31 | 222/190 | 1/1 | 1/4 | 6.7/5.4 | 475/217 | 6.0/3.4 |
10/27/12 Washington St. | 24-17 | -24.0 L | 37/23 | 131/48 | 3.5/2.1 | 0/0 | 7/43 | 15/60 | 125/337 | 0/1 | 3/10 | 6.9/4.8 | 256/385 | 4.7/4.1 |
11/03/12 @ Colorado | 48-0 | -27.5 W | 37/20 | 217/31 | 5.9/1.6 | 0/2 | 25/12 | 34/23 | 223/51 | 0/1 | 2/7 | 6.2/1.7 | 440/82 | 6.0/1.6 |
11/10/12 Oregon St. | 27-23 | -4.0 T | 35/28 | 180/107 | 5.1/3.8 | 2/1 | 22/23 | 29/39 | 243/205 | 2/0 | 2/3 | 7.8/4.9 | 423/312 | 6.4/4.5 |
11/17/12 @ Oregon | 17-14 | +20.5 W | 44/40 | 208/204 | 4.7/5.1 | 2/0 | 25/21 | 36/37 | 206/201 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 5.6/5.3 | 414/405 | 5.1/5.2 |
Notes: | 1. Spreads shown relative to the Stanford. 2. Stats read as Offense/Defense or Stanford/Opponent. 3. Stats are versus Div-1A teams only. Div-1AA games are not included. |